recruiters.fyi
Comparison · Hays Specialist Recruitment Japan K.K. & Michael Page / PageGroup Japan

Hays Japan vs Page Group

ヘイズ・ジャパン と ページグループ — 構造比較

Hays Japan and PageGroup Japan are FTSE 250-listed generalist contingency recruiters with multi-vertical Tokyo footprints. Both opened Tokyo offices in 2001. Both reported Japan as a growth pocket in their most recent parent-group disclosures (Hays Q3 FY2026: Japan +33%; PageGroup Q1 2026: Japan +17%). The structural differences are in contracting depth, retained-arm strategy, geographic scope, and group-level scale.

Last updated 2026-05-03

At a glance — side by side

Listed parent
Hays plc (LSE: HAS) — FTSE 250
PageGroup plc (LSE: PAGE) — FTSE 250
Tokyo office opened
2001
2001
Japan offices
Tokyo, Yokohama, Osaka
Tokyo (Toranomon)
Vertical coverage (live tags)
8 verticals: BF, tech, life sciences, legal & compliance, HR, supply chain, industrial, consumer
9 verticals: same 8 + sales & marketing
Business model
Contingency-led; technology and engineering contracting (haken) at scale; group-level RPO
Contingency (Michael Page) + Retained (Page Executive, Tokyo since 2021) + Page Personnel (junior/volume) + Page Outsourcing (RPO)
Reported fee positioning
Standard market band — 25% in BF, 30–35% in other verticals
Standard market band — 25% in BF, 30–35% in other verticals
Most recent disclosure
Q3 FY2026: Asia +8% led by Japan +33%; engineering & tech contracting Japan +40% YoY
Q1 2026: Japan +17% YoY ('an area of strategic focus'); APAC +9.3%; group GP £187m (–4.9%)
Public review platform
Glassdoor 3.6/5 (~68 reviews); Tokyo WLB scored below global Hays average per reviewer commentary
Both samples are reviewer-sourced; treat as anonymous-platform sentiment, not authoritative.
Glassdoor 3.8/5 (~43 reviews); recommend-to-friend 72% Japan vs 41% global per reviewer commentary

Dimensions sourced from each firm's profile in this directory and from publicly disclosed parent-company filings. See methodology below.

The third leg of the UK-listed-generalist triangle

Hays Japan and PageGroup Japan complete the UK-listed-generalist triangle in the directory's coverage of the bilingual Japan recruiting market. (The third member, Robert Walters, has its own pages comparing it to each.) Hays and PageGroup share structural DNA: both are FTSE 250-listed UK contingency recruiters; both opened Tokyo offices in 2001; both run multi-vertical contingency desks; both reported Japan as a growth pocket in their most recent parent disclosures.

The differences between them are sharper than between any other pair in the UK-listed triangle. Hays' Japan business is contracting-weighted (engineering & technology contracting Japan +40% YoY in Q3 FY2026); PageGroup's Japan business runs a separately branded retained arm (Page Executive, live since 2021). Hays operates from three Japan offices (Tokyo, Yokohama, Osaka); PageGroup is Tokyo-only. PageGroup carries a sales & marketing live vertical tag; Hays does not. PageGroup is structurally larger at the parent level (4,994 group fee-earners vs Hays' undisclosed Japan-specific figure within a larger global group).

Business model comparison

Hays Japan runs a contingency-led permanent placement model with substantial contracting (haken) depth in technology and engineering. The Q3 FY2026 trading statement specifically called out engineering and technology contracting in Japan as growing over 40% YoY — signalling that the Japan business has a distinctive contracting weight relative to the group's permanent-placement core. Hays plc's Asia Salary Guide 2026 is published as a public industry reference document.

PageGroup Japan runs a multi-brand contingency + retained + junior-volume structure from a single Toranomon office. Michael Page is the mid-to-senior contingency core. Page Executive is the named retained executive search brand (live in Tokyo since 2021), explicitly targeting C-1 / C-suite retained mandates. Page Personnel handles junior / volume recruitment. Page Outsourcing handles group-level RPO. The Japan business is internally segmented into Gaishi (foreign-capital), Nikkei (Japanese-domiciled), and Page Personnel disciplines.

The structural takeaway: PageGroup's role-band footprint is wider through the Page Personnel + Michael Page + Page Executive segmentation. Hays' contracting depth is wider through the haken / engineering-contracting practice. Neither firm strictly dominates the other.

Vertical coverage comparison

Both firms tag eight common live verticals: banking & financial services, technology, life sciences, legal & compliance, HR, supply chain & procurement, industrial / manufacturing, and consumer & retail. PageGroup additionally tags sales & marketing as a live vertical; Hays does not. For employers running sales & marketing roles, this is a structural difference — PageGroup carries the live coverage; Hays does not.

Within the eight shared verticals:

  • Hays has identifiable depth in technology and engineering contracting (the +40% YoY Q3 FY2026 signal), industrial and supply chain contracting, and life sciences. Hays' BF desk operates standard market band; the firm doesn't carry the front-office hedge-fund / asset-management depth of pure-play FS specialists.
  • PageGroup has identifiable depth in finance & accounting (a long-running franchise), technology mid-to-senior product/engineering, engineering & manufacturing, HR, legal, and procurement & supply chain. Page Executive's retained-search overlay covers C-1 / C-suite mandates in the same verticals.

For most employers running multi-vertical hiring across permanent and contract roles, Hays and PageGroup are commonly engaged alongside each other rather than as substitutes — the contracting / permanent split and the foreign-capital / Japanese-domiciled segmentation create natural complementarity.

Geographic and operational footprint

Hays Japan runs Tokyo, Yokohama, and Osaka. The Yokohama office is structurally relevant — Yokohama is the cluster for industrial supply chain (Nissan, the Keihin manufacturing belt, automotive Tier-1 suppliers). For an industrial supply chain hiring manager, having a Yokohama presence is operationally meaningful.

PageGroup Japan runs a Tokyo-only structure headquartered in Toranomon. The firm has not publicly disclosed an Osaka or Yokohama satellite. For employers based in Kansai (Osaka, Kyoto, Kobe), this is a structural difference — Hays has a Kansai presence; PageGroup does not.

On parent-firm headcount: PageGroup disclosed group fee-earner headcount of 4,994 in Q1 2026 (+26 QoQ). Hays plc does not separately disclose Japan headcount; the firm reports approximately 80% of its global business is now international vs 20% UK. Both firms are larger at the group level than Robert Walters; neither breaks out Japan-specific consultant headcount.

Tokyo-office leadership: Grant Torrens has been MD of Hays Japan since 15 February 2021 (also Chief Customer Officer Asia). Toby Truscott leads PageGroup Japan across Gaishi, Nikkei, and Temp/Contract teams; Mark Enticott leads Page Executive Japan. Both firms have stable Tokyo leadership.

Candidate pool and employer overlap

Both firms place predominantly into:

  • Foreign-capital corporate Japan operations (technology, pharma, consumer goods, industrial, financial services)
  • Japanese-domiciled large-caps building bilingual functions
  • PE-backed portfolio companies

The candidate-pool overlap is substantial across the eight shared verticals. The structural differences come from role-shape rather than employer:

  • Hays places more contract / haken roles within the same employer where PageGroup places permanent / Page Personnel / Page Executive roles.
  • PageGroup has a wider role-band coverage (junior through senior + retained executive) within the same employer; Hays' role-band coverage is narrower at the senior / retained end.
  • Sales & marketing roles are PageGroup-coverage-only on the directory's live tags; Hays does not tag this vertical.

For senior C-1 / C-suite mandates, Page Executive competes with the global retained firms (Korn Ferry, Heidrick & Struggles which is private since Dec 2025, Spencer Stuart, Russell Reynolds, Egon Zehnder) and with Robert Walters' retained-overlay engagements. Hays does not run a separately branded retained arm at this level.

Fee positioning

Both firms operate within the directory's reported market bands. Banking & financial services contingency: 25%. All other shared verticals: 30–35%. Sales & marketing roles (PageGroup-only) priced on OTE. Retained search through Page Executive: ~33% of expected first-year total compensation, three milestone instalments.

Discount fees under MSA terms: roughly 20–22% in BF; 25–28% in other verticals. Banded only — neither firm publishes account-level fee terms. Contracting (haken) at Hays uses a time-and-materials margin model rather than a percentage-of-comp placement fee.

Recent disclosures (2024–2026)

Hays plc

  • Q3 FY2026 trading statement: Asia +8% led by Japan +33%; engineering and technology contracting in Japan up over 40% YoY. Sourced from Hays plc Q3 trading statement (investegate.co.uk URL confirmed in directory news index).
  • Leadership transition (27 February 2026): CEO Dirk Hahn stepped down for personal reasons after 28 years; Mark Dearnley appointed interim CEO.
  • Multiple group-level cost-action programs through 2024–2025.
  • Hays Asia Salary Guide 2026 published.

PageGroup plc

  • Q1 2026 trading update (14 April 2026): Japan +17% YoY ('an area of strategic focus'); APAC +9.3% (4th consecutive growth quarter); group GP £187m (–4.9% constant currency).
  • Group fee-earner headcount 4,994 (+26 QoQ).
  • CEO commentary cited Middle East conflict as 'driving an increasingly uncertain outlook'; next group update scheduled 13 July 2026.

Both Japan businesses are growing in 2026 against flat-to-down group performance. Both have FTSE 250 parent infrastructure and quarterly trading-update transparency. Both have stable Tokyo-office leadership through ongoing parent-level transitions: Hays' CEO transition does not appear to have affected the Japan Tokyo-office leadership (Grant Torrens has been MD since 15 February 2021); PageGroup's Japan leadership is stable under MD Toby Truscott with Mark Enticott heading Page Executive specifically.

Internal segmentation — Gaishi/Nikkei vs sub-desk specialisation

PageGroup Japan and Hays Japan structure their internal consultant teams differently.

PageGroup Japan segments its Tokyo office into three explicit disciplines: Gaishi (foreign-capital), Nikkei (Japanese-domiciled), and Page Personnel (junior/volume). Each discipline has a separate consultant pool reporting into Japan MD Toby Truscott. Page Executive operates as a separately branded retained executive search practice on top of the Michael Page contingency core. The structural intent is to align consultant capability and language posture (gaishi-leaning English-first vs nikkei-leaning Japanese-business-first) with the candidate-pool and client-pool boundary.

Hays Japan uses sub-desk specialisation by vertical and by role type rather than by foreign-capital / Japanese-domiciled split. Hays runs specialist desks in banking & financial services, technology, life sciences, legal & compliance, HR, supply chain, industrial, and consumer, with the contracting (haken) practice running as a distinct stream that picks up technical and engineering-adjacent contract work. The Gaishi / Nikkei boundary is handled at the consultant level rather than as a discipline structure.

The practical implication for an employer: PageGroup's Gaishi team is a closer fit for a foreign-capital corporate hiring purely into its Tokyo bilingual gaishi pool. PageGroup's Nikkei team is a closer fit for a Japanese-domiciled large-cap building a bilingual function. Hays' contracting depth is the closer fit for an industrial / supply chain hiring manager filling technical contract roles via haken.

Candidate experience — what reviewer commentary suggests

Reviewer commentary on Glassdoor (treat as anonymous-platform sentiment, not authoritative) suggests directionally different cultures inside the two firms.

Hays Japan Glassdoor signal aggregates 3.6/5 across approximately 68 reviews. The Tokyo office specifically scores meaningfully lower on work-life-balance and culture than the global Hays average per reviewer commentary. Reviewer themes reference the salary guide and brand recognition as career credentials and structured global training resources as a positive. Concerns referenced include layoff cycles at the Tokyo office, work-life-balance scores below the global average, and periodic restructuring events. Reviewer commentary references multi-cycle restructuring events at the Tokyo office over a 2-year window.

PageGroup Japan Glassdoor signal aggregates 3.8/5 across approximately 43 reviews. Recommend-to-friend is reported at 72% in Japan vs 41% globally — a meaningful Japan-specific positive divergence. Reviewer themes reference structured progression criteria for early-career consultants and access to a recognised industry credential through the brand. Concerns referenced include a heavily social after-work culture, high turnover at the consultant level (particularly within the early 1–2 years (per anonymous reviewers)), and personal commission rates described as lower than at certain peer firms.

For a candidate weighing the two firms during a job search, the structural difference comes through in mandate flow and team scale. Hays' contracting depth means more contract / haken mandate flow at the Tokyo office; PageGroup's Page Personnel + Michael Page + Page Executive band coverage means a wider role-band mandate flow at the same office. The two firms produce different daily work shapes for a consultant joining either.

When each tends to fit (structurally appropriate)

Hays Japan is structurally fit for employers running engineering / technology contracting (haken) at scale; for industrial and supply chain hiring concentrated in the Yokohama / Keihin manufacturing belt where Hays has a satellite office; for Kansai-based employers needing an Osaka office presence; and for candidates pursuing technical or engineering-adjacent contracting work where Hays' Q3 FY2026 +40% YoY contracting growth signals active mandate flow.

PageGroup is structurally fit for employers wanting role-band coverage across junior, mid, and senior simultaneously through Page Personnel + Michael Page + Page Executive; for retained executive engagements where Page Executive's Tokyo presence is the relevant retained-search route; for sales & marketing roles which PageGroup tags as a live vertical and Hays does not; and for employers segmenting between foreign-capital (Gaishi) and Japanese-domiciled (Nikkei) hiring needs and wanting a partner that maps consultant teams to that segmentation.

Where both fit — generalist mid-senior contingency hires across the eight shared verticals — both firms are commonly engaged in parallel. For multi-firm engagement, Hays' contracting depth and PageGroup's retained / role-band depth produce natural complementarity rather than direct substitution.

Frequently asked questions

Is PageGroup bigger than Hays Japan?
REPORTED

On a parent-firm basis, PageGroup is structurally larger than Robert Walters by group fee-earner headcount (4,994 in Q1 2026); Hays plc does not publicly break out Japan headcount but the global group is larger than PageGroup at the parent revenue level. In Japan specifically, neither firm publicly discloses Japan-only consultant headcount. Both reported Japan as a growth pocket in their most recent disclosures: Hays Q3 FY2026 Japan +33%; PageGroup Q1 2026 Japan +17%. A like-for-like Japan-headcount comparison is not publicly available.

What is the difference between Hays Japan and Page Personnel for junior roles?
CONFIRMED

Page Personnel is PageGroup's named junior / volume permanent placement brand, operating from the same Toranomon office as Michael Page and Page Executive. It targets entry-level and early-career bilingual roles in finance & accounting, sales support, and admin. Hays Japan does not run a separately branded junior-volume arm; junior roles run through the same consultant teams as mid-career placements, with the firm's contracting / haken practice picking up entry-level technical roles via dispatch staffing. Structurally, Page Personnel is the closer fit for a foreign-capital corporate filling junior bilingual roles via permanent placement; Hays' contracting practice is the closer fit for filling junior technical roles via contract / haken.

Does Hays Japan cover sales and marketing roles?
CONFIRMED

Hays Japan does not tag sales & marketing as a live vertical on the directory; PageGroup does. For a Japan-based foreign-capital employer running a sales & marketing search, PageGroup carries the live tag and operates a Sales & Marketing desk at the Tokyo office; among the other UK-listed generalists, Robert Walters also tags sales & marketing live. Hays takes commercial roles through other desks rather than via a tagged sales & marketing practice.

Where do Hays Japan and PageGroup compete for the same candidates?
SYNTHESIS

The two firms have substantial candidate-pool overlap across the eight shared verticals — banking & financial services, technology, life sciences, legal & compliance, HR, supply chain, industrial, and consumer. The pool of bilingual mid-career candidates (N1 / near-native Japanese plus business English, 5–15 years specialist experience) is the same pool both firms source from. Where they diverge is in role-shape inside the same employer: Hays places more contract / haken roles in clients where PageGroup places permanent / retained roles. Senior C-1 / C-suite candidates engaging Page Executive's retained search arm typically also engage the global retained firms (Korn Ferry, Heidrick & Struggles which is private since Dec 2025, Spencer Stuart, Russell Reynolds, Egon Zehnder).

What are the placement fees at Hays Japan and PageGroup?
REPORTED

Both firms operate within the directory's reported market bands. In the directory's reported set, Banking & financial services contingency: 25% of first-year total compensation — in the directory's reported set, the only vertical where the market has standardised at this rate. All other shared verticals (tech, life sciences, legal, HR, industrial, consumer, supply chain): 30–35%. Sales & marketing roles (PageGroup only on the live tags): commonly priced on first-year on-target earnings (OTE) rather than base. Page Executive retained search at director level: ~33% of expected first-year compensation, three milestone instalments. Hays' contracting (haken) practice uses a time-and-materials margin model. Banded only — neither firm publishes account-level fee terms.

Does Hays Japan have a retained executive search arm comparable to Page Executive?
CONFIRMED

No. Hays Japan does not run a separately branded retained executive search arm comparable to Page Executive (which has been live in Tokyo since 2021 specifically for C-1 / C-suite retained mandates). Hays takes individual retained engagements through its core consultant teams when warranted, but does not market a distinct retained sub-brand at the senior-leadership level. For director-and-above bilingual mandates, Page Executive is one route; the global retained firms (Korn Ferry, Heidrick & Struggles which is private since Dec 2025, Spencer Stuart, Russell Reynolds, Egon Zehnder) and the Japanese-domiciled retained brands (RGF Executive Search Japan, JAC Executive) cover the same mandate level via separately branded retained practices.

Should I work for Hays Japan or PageGroup as a recruiter?
REPORTED

Both firms have FTSE 250 parent infrastructure, structured graduate and mid-career intake pathways, and public training reputations. Reviewer signal on public platforms (treat as anonymous-platform sentiment, not authoritative): Hays Tokyo aggregates 3.6/5 across approximately 68 reviews with reviewers describing Tokyo-specific WLB and culture scores below the global Hays average; PageGroup Japan aggregates 3.8/5 across approximately 43 reviews with recommend-to-friend reported at 72% Japan vs 41% globally. PageGroup runs an explicit Gaishi / Nikkei / Page Personnel discipline structure; Hays runs sub-desk specialisation with substantial contracting (haken) practice. Compensation models differ in detail; both run individual-commission structures. Candidates commonly weigh both during a job search and commit based on team / consultant-pool fit.

Methodology

This comparison is built from the two firm profiles in the directory plus publicly disclosed parent-company filings (LSE / TSE / NYSE / NASDAQ / SIX / Euronext earnings statements, trading updates, press releases) and the broader corpus of vertical and guide pages. Structural patterns shared across the two firms are labelled synthesis; specific firm-level facts are confirmed against the firm profile or reported against the cited disclosure. The "When each tends to fit (structurally appropriate)" section is decision framing — not a recommendation. See editorial standards for the sourcing framework and the rationale for refusing to rank firms.

Last refreshed 2026-05-03. Material changes (M&A, listing changes, leadership transitions, fee benchmarks) trigger updates within seven days of public confirmation.

Sources cited

  • PRIMARYHays plc Q3 FY2026 trading statement: Asia +8% led by Japan +33%; engineering & tech contracting Japan +40% YoY [link]
  • PRIMARYPageGroup plc Q1 2026 trading update: Japan +17% YoY; APAC +9.3%; group GP £187m (–4.9%); fee-earner headcount 4,994 [link]
  • PRIMARYHays plc CEO transition announcement: Dirk Hahn steps down 27 February 2026; Mark Dearnley interim CEO
  • PRIMARYPageGroup Japan corporate page: Page Executive Tokyo launch 2021